The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Fri Jun 29 14:12:12 UTC 2007
In ARIN you have a policy to request IPv6 PI. So what is the problem ?
> De: Christian Kuhtz <kuhtzch at corp.earthlink.net>
> Responder a: <owner-nanog at merit.edu>
> Fecha: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:37:23 +0000
> Para: Andy Davidson <andy at nosignal.org>, <owner-nanog at merit.edu>, Donald Stahl
> <don at calis.blacksun.org>
> CC: <nanog at nanog.org>
> Asunto: Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
> Until there's a practical solution for multihoming, this whole discussion is
> pretty pointless.
> Sent from my BlackBerry.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Davidson <andy at nosignal.org>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:27:33
> To:Donald Stahl <don at calis.blacksun.org>
> Cc:nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
> On 29 Jun 2007, at 14:24, Donald Stahl wrote:
>>> That's the thing .. google's crawlers and search app runs at layer
>>> 7, v6 is an addressing system that runs at layer 3. If we'd (the
>>> community) got everything right with v6, it wouldn't matter to
>>> Google's applications whether the content came from a site hosted
>>> on a v4 address, or a v6 address, or even both.
>> If Google does not have v6 connectivity then how are they going to
>> crawl those v6 sites?
> I think we're debating from very similar positions...
> v6 isn't the ideal scenario of '96 extra bits for free', because if
> life was so simple, we wouldn't need to ask this question.
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
More information about the NANOG