TransAtlantic Cable Break
kuhtzch at corp.earthlink.net
Mon Jun 25 12:47:02 UTC 2007
Yes, definitely. Convergence isn't all it's cracked up to be alright.. But it likely is also because of different design goals.
Convergence doesn't have to suck, it just does more so at the moment because we still have an amalgam of technologies dealing largely only with expression of convergence rather than convergence as an integral part of the technology itself.
And what you describe is a reflection of that.
Or that's what I think.
Sent from my BlackBerry.
From: Sean Donelan <sean at donelan.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:22:47
To:"Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow at verizonbusiness.com>
Cc:nanog <nanog at merit.edu>
Subject: Re: TransAtlantic Cable Break
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> I suppose if you had some special traffic you could qos up that and down
> everything else but that wasn't quite what Simon was getting at I don't
Although we may think IP is everything, Internet traffic is not the
only type of traffice carried by telecommunication transmission systems.
If you take the entire cable system from a transmission engineer's point
of view, it looks different than from an IP engineer's point of view.
Remember last year during the earthquake near Tawain, air traffic control
and pstn voice capacity came back faster than Internet capacity.
Convergence isn't all its cracked up to be.
More information about the NANOG