Network Level Content Blocking (UK) for people who cant be bothered to read the article..

Leigh Porter leigh.porter at
Fri Jun 8 09:43:46 UTC 2007

Alexander Harrowell wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter at> wrote:
>> Since only port 80 is passed through the filter then of course there are
>> all manor of things you could do to circumvent the filter and this will
>> of course always be the case as people will use whatever they can to get
>> what they want. After all, all yuo really need to do in order to get all
>> the dodgy material you want is to subscribe to a decent USENET service
>> and get it all from that.
>> For what it's worth though it works well for what it is and we certainly
>> get a few hits on it.
> Have you been asked by the Dibble for the squid's server log yet? It's
> the obvious next step - if you had a URL request blocked, obviously
> you were where you shouldn't have been. You're either with us...or
> you're with the terrorists.

I actually removed the code in Squid that logs so it's impossible to log 
without significant development work ;-)

Leigh Porter

More information about the NANOG mailing list