Security gain from NAT

Sam Stickland sam_mailinglists at
Mon Jun 4 22:34:30 UTC 2007

Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I can think of one counter-example to this argument, and that's
> SSL-protected services, where having a proxy, transparent or otherwise, in
> your data stream just isn't going to work.  
Not so. Look at:


More information about the NANOG mailing list