IPv6 Advertisements

Iljitsch van Beijnum iljitsch at muada.com
Sat Jun 2 14:56:57 UTC 2007

On 1-jun-2007, at 14:58, Chris L. Morrow wrote:

>>> I believe that a separate /48 per site is better regardless of  
>>> whether
>>> or not the company has contracted with a single ISP for all  
>>> sites, or
>>> not. As far as I am concerned if there is a separate access circuit,
>>> then it is a site and it deserves its own /48 assignment/allocation.

>> So aggregation is no longer a goal?

> why do you say that? he COULD mean that they should get their ip
> assignment from their provider, which would/should aggregate for  
> him...
> right?

I thought we were talking about PI... Obviously with PA the only  
issue would be burning through an ISP's space very fast, but with  
IPv6 that's not a huge deal.

More information about the NANOG mailing list