NANOG 40 agenda posted
randy at psg.com
Sat Jun 2 14:14:02 UTC 2007
Kradorex Xeron wrote:
> On Saturday 02 June 2007 01:09, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>>> how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits?
>>>>> why won't they do this in v6?
>>>> wee, lookie! redistribute connected
>>> whee! lookie! minds disconnected, at least from public good.
>> Yes :( sadly I suspect that is not the only mistake/misconfig/malconfig
>> happening in the world :(
> Doesn't everything that require a configuration have someone who eventually
> screws it up? :P
yes. and with ula-c, it's exactly the same as pi. except there is one
advantage, ula-c relies on the router vendor to fill in the prefix. you
still have to choose the interface to which to apply it (think two
external upstreams and five site links).
More information about the NANOG