NANOG 40 agenda posted
admin at digibase.ca
Sat Jun 2 07:31:17 UTC 2007
On Saturday 02 June 2007 01:09, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
> > >> how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits?
> > >> why won't they do this in v6?
> > >
> > > wee, lookie! redistribute connected
> > whee! lookie! minds disconnected, at least from public good.
> Yes :( sadly I suspect that is not the only mistake/misconfig/malconfig
> happening in the world :(
Doesn't everything that require a configuration have someone who eventually
screws it up? :P
It's a case of Murphy's law - If something can go wrong, it will - You just
have to deal with the result and recover gracefully.
More information about the NANOG