IPv6 Advertisements

Chris L. Morrow christopher.morrow at verizonbusiness.com
Fri Jun 1 12:58:15 UTC 2007



On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

>
> On 1-jun-2007, at 10:09, <michael.dillon at bt.com>
> <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:
>
> > I believe that a separate /48 per site is better regardless of whether
> > or not the company has contracted with a single ISP for all sites, or
> > not. As far as I am concerned if there is a separate access circuit,
> > then it is a site and it deserves its own /48 assignment/allocation.
>
> So aggregation is no longer a goal?

why do you say that? he COULD mean that they should get their ip
assignment from their provider, which would/should aggregate for him...
right?



More information about the NANOG mailing list