TWTC issue with Foundry routers?

Ryan Harden hardenrm at uiuc.edu
Thu Jul 26 15:02:54 UTC 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

As a Foundry user utilizing Communities this caught my eye...I found a
similar post to Nanog last year that pointed me in the right direction
on this I think. It seems the author of that post seems to have hit the
nail on th head.

Your debugging shows
Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv invalid COMMUNITY attribute flag d0

Decoded, the Attribute flag 'd0' means the attribute is: Optional,
transitive, and extended (greater than 255 octets)

It seems when the FI400 receives the 'd0' flag stating that the next
update has an extended attribute field, it borks.

I'd guess this due to a large amount of Communities attached to that
prefix for whatever reason. Though I suppose the upstream router could
be at fault for flagging 'd0' and then sending a _non_ extended
attribute. Its hard to tell.

One would assume that the FI400 should merely discard that update rather
than take the session down, but I need to read more into the RFC to know
for sure.

Sorry I don't have a definitive answer, but you might ask TWTC to
_actually_ not send you communities and see if it goes away. :) Either
way it seems a call to Foundry TAC is in order as this is unacceptable
behavior.

Original Post from 2006:
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2006-04/msg00034.html

/Ryan

David Hubbard wrote:
> Anyone know of any changes that were made with TWTC (AS 4323)
> last night that may have affected those running Foundry
> routers?  We peer with a number of providers and last night
> our TWTC connection went down with:
> 
> 
> Jul 25 15:57:22:N:BGP Peer 1.2.3.49 DOWN (Attribute Flags Error)
> Jul 25 15:57:14:N:BGP Peer 1.2.3.49 UP (ESTABLISHED)
> 
> If I debug updates on that session I get:
> (Lines added for readability)
> 
> 
> Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE 142.166.102.0/24
> Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE w/attr: Origin=IGP
> AS_PATH=AS_SEQ(2) 4323 8881 8881 8881 30915 NextHop=1.2.3.49
> COMMUNITY=4323:51 4323:501 4323:1003 4323:2001 4323:2503 4323:34510
> 4323:50000 65101:1003 65102:4 65103:1 65104:301 
> Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE 193.27.220.0/23
> Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE w/attr: Origin=IGP
> AS_PATH=AS_SEQ(2) 4323 2828 19092 14188 14188 14188 14188 14188
> NextHop=1.2.3.49 COMMUNITY=4323:51 4323:501 4323:1015 4323:2503
> 4323:36410 4323:50000 65101:1015 65102:4 65103:1 65104:301 
> Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE 64.13.0.0/22
> 
> 
> Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv invalid COMMUNITY attribute flag d0
> 
> 
> Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE w/attr: Origin=IGP
> AS_PATH=AS_SEQ(2) 4323 12956 3352 NextHop=1.2.3.49 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE
> AGGREGATOR AS=3352 Speaker=81.46.63.133 
> 
> 
> 
> The router is a Foundry NetIron 400 running their 7.8 code.
> We have two of these talking to Level 3, TWTC, Cogent, Uunet
> and AT&T and only the TWTC had an issue.  They sent me a
> default route instead of full routes and the session came
> up and was stable; go back to full routes and error.  They
> admitted to me this afternoon that three other customers are
> having the same issue.  That's when we started wondering if
> they changed something that the Foundry code doesn't like.
> Interesting though is that they claim to not be sending me
> communities while the output above indicates they are.
> 
> Any ideas; be nice to get the link back up. :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David

- --
Ryan M. Harden, BS, KC9IHX		Office: 217-265-5192
CITES - Network Engineering		Cell:  	630-363-0365
2130 Digital Computer Lab		Fax:    217-244-7089
1304 W. Springfield	 		email:  hardenrm at uiuc.edu
Urbana, IL  61801 			

	 University of Illinois - Urbana/Champaign
                     -  All your Base -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGqLedtuPckBBbXboRAo+hAJ9lmxtsgZ5jCRN9K1LQYwxgaYHuGgCfeEkp
aMi5H7z3nnAEu1v6jwpKth8=
=HtEt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the NANOG mailing list