TWTC issue with Foundry routers?

David Hubbard dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com
Wed Jul 25 20:00:37 UTC 2007


Anyone know of any changes that were made with TWTC (AS 4323)
last night that may have affected those running Foundry
routers?  We peer with a number of providers and last night
our TWTC connection went down with:


Jul 25 15:57:22:N:BGP Peer 1.2.3.49 DOWN (Attribute Flags Error)
Jul 25 15:57:14:N:BGP Peer 1.2.3.49 UP (ESTABLISHED)

If I debug updates on that session I get:
(Lines added for readability)


Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE 142.166.102.0/24
Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE w/attr: Origin=IGP
AS_PATH=AS_SEQ(2) 4323 8881 8881 8881 30915 NextHop=1.2.3.49
COMMUNITY=4323:51 4323:501 4323:1003 4323:2001 4323:2503 4323:34510
4323:50000 65101:1003 65102:4 65103:1 65104:301 
Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE 193.27.220.0/23
Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE w/attr: Origin=IGP
AS_PATH=AS_SEQ(2) 4323 2828 19092 14188 14188 14188 14188 14188
NextHop=1.2.3.49 COMMUNITY=4323:51 4323:501 4323:1015 4323:2503
4323:36410 4323:50000 65101:1015 65102:4 65103:1 65104:301 
Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE 64.13.0.0/22


Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv invalid COMMUNITY attribute flag d0


Jul 25 15:57:21 BGP: 1.2.3.49 rcv UPDATE w/attr: Origin=IGP
AS_PATH=AS_SEQ(2) 4323 12956 3352 NextHop=1.2.3.49 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE
AGGREGATOR AS=3352 Speaker=81.46.63.133 



The router is a Foundry NetIron 400 running their 7.8 code.
We have two of these talking to Level 3, TWTC, Cogent, Uunet
and AT&T and only the TWTC had an issue.  They sent me a
default route instead of full routes and the session came
up and was stable; go back to full routes and error.  They
admitted to me this afternoon that three other customers are
having the same issue.  That's when we started wondering if
they changed something that the Foundry code doesn't like.
Interesting though is that they claim to not be sending me
communities while the output above indicates they are.

Any ideas; be nice to get the link back up. :-)

Thanks,

David



More information about the NANOG mailing list