Level(3) faux paux

Thu Jul 12 13:18:12 UTC 2007

owner-nanog at merit.edu wrote on 07/12/2007 01:56:32 AM:

> I have noticed that Level(3) misconfigs/outages seem to happen more 
> frequently than with most other Tier 1?s.  Am unsure whether or not 
> this is a mis-statement, but based on NANOG posts, Level(3) [AS3356]
> seems to show up more often with issues than say Sprint [AS1239].

As mentioned previously, there are a lot of variables that effect this 
claim.

> Is their any one (or any coporation) that keeps track of outages 
> such as these?  Would think it might be a good thing to know for 
> proper mulit-homing relationships to minimize the type of outage 
> that Yahoo faced?

A lot of businesses include this sort of data in their quarterly reports. 
Some of your questions might be answered by
reports like this one => 
http://www.level3.com/newsroom/pressreleases/2007/20070426.html

Additionally, I'd do a Google search for terms like "System Availability" 
and include some Tier 1 providers to see
what kind of data comes back.  Then just go from there.

Tim Rainier
_____________________________________________________________ 
THIS E-MAIL is private correspondence and is intended only for the 
identified recipients. We attempt to correctly address all e-mails, but if 
for any reason you have received this message in error, please take notice 
that you should not disclose or distribute this message to any other 
person. You should immediately notify the sender and delete this message. 
If the message contains or attaches CONFIDENTIAL information, you must 
treat that information confidentially. For questions, please contact the 
sender.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070712/e69614f4/attachment.html>