Google wants to be your Internet
Roland Dobbins
rdobbins at cisco.com
Wed Jan 24 14:29:57 UTC 2007
On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:48 AM, <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:
> The whole address conservation mantra has turned out to be a lot
> of smoke and mirrors anyway.
At the time, yes, this particular issue was overhyped, just as the
routing-table-expansion issue was underhyped. As we move to an
'Internet of Things', however, it will become manifestl
With regards to the perceived advantages and disadvantages of IPv6 as
it is currently defined, there is wide range of opinion on the
subject. For many, the 'still-need-NAT-under-IPv6 vs. IPv6-
eliminates-the-need-for-NAT' debate is of minor importance compared
to more fundamental questions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at cisco.com> // 408.527.6376 voice
Technology is legislation.
-- Karl Schroeder
More information about the NANOG
mailing list