IPv6 section of ARIN Number Resource Policy (Sec 22.214.171.124.c)
nicolas at antel.net.uy
Wed Jan 17 16:23:29 UTC 2007
This question is about the IPv6 section of ARIN Number Resource Policy
>From the manual (Section 126.96.36.199.c):
188.8.131.52. Initial allocation criteria
c. Plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations to which it will
assign IPv6 address space, by advertising that connectivity through its
single aggregated address allocation
We have a problem with this policy and we would like to know if any other
ISP experienced the same...
The problem raises when a RIR assign a /28 prefix (for example) to an ISP
which has 3 internet links with 3 different carriers (tier 1 carriers, for
example) using BGP publications.
Acording to ARIN (and most other RIRs) policy, the ISP must advertise
through all the 3 links the /28 without the possibility of dissagregation.
The problem with this policy is that by doing this, the ISP loses control
of the traffic, not being able to distribute the traffic over the 3
A /28 prefix may have a lot of incoming traffic associated to it, so I
believe the dissagregation (subnets) of the prefix should be allowed by
What do you think? Do you have a similar problem?
More information about the NANOG