Routing Loop Strangeness

Justin M. Streiner streiner at
Thu Jan 4 21:35:25 UTC 2007

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:

>> 25 44 msec
>> 26 48 msec
>> 27 48 msec
>> 28 48 msec
> Yep. Way cool.

Unfortunately it's not the first time that:
1) someone with enable screwed up a routing design or did something dumb 
like dueling static routes, or some similar kind of rubbish.
2) someone with enable (or someone who manages peple with enable) co-opted 
arbitrary non-1918 IP space for use on their internal network.  Calling it 
RFC1919 space would almost be funny if it weren't such a pain the butt to 
deal with people who do things like this.


More information about the NANOG mailing list