Routing Loop Strangeness
Justin M. Streiner
streiner at cluebyfour.org
Thu Jan 4 21:35:25 UTC 2007
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
>> 25 184.108.40.206 44 msec
>> 26 220.127.116.11 48 msec
>> 27 18.104.22.168 48 msec
>> 28 22.214.171.124 48 msec
> Yep. Way cool.
Unfortunately it's not the first time that:
1) someone with enable screwed up a routing design or did something dumb
like dueling static routes, or some similar kind of rubbish.
2) someone with enable (or someone who manages peple with enable) co-opted
arbitrary non-1918 IP space for use on their internal network. Calling it
RFC1919 space would almost be funny if it weren't such a pain the butt to
deal with people who do things like this.
More information about the NANOG