Quick BGP peering question
Jack Bates
jbates at brightok.net
Wed Jan 3 17:31:35 UTC 2007
James Blessing wrote:
> Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on sending 0
> prefixes across a BGP session?
>
I just ran through a related issue with one of my upstream peers. It appears
that they have a RPF strictly enforced policy, yet during the process of
renumbering a customer of a customer from another ISPs space, they were wanting
to throw all traffic (our IPs and the other provider's) out to us.
It comes down to a simple question of policy, and if you are going to mandate
how your customers route proper, valid traffic. I about pulled the plug in my
situation, but finally got it sorted out. Thank goodness some routers can allow
exceptions to RPF and other providers just use ACLs instead.
0 prefixes is no different than partial prefixes. Asymmetric routing should not
be a crime on the Internet because "I don't like it" or "but basic RPF is easier
and you're doing something funky anyways".
Jack Bates
More information about the NANOG
mailing list