botnets: web servers, end-systems and Vint Cerf

Sean Donelan sean at donelan.com
Sun Feb 18 00:38:54 UTC 2007


On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Petri Helenius wrote:
>> After all these years, I'm still surprised a consortium of ISP's haven't 
>> figured out a way to do something a-la Packet Fence for their clients where 
>> - whenever an infected machine is detected after logging in, that machine 
>> is thrown into say a VLAN with instructions on how to clean their machines 
>> before they're allowed to go further and stay online.
> This has been commercially available for quite some time so it would be only 
> up to the providers to implement it.

Public ISPs have been testing these types of systems for over 5 years. 
What sorts of differences can you think of that would explain why public
ISPs have found them not very effective?

Public ISPs have been using walled gardens for a long time for user 
registration and collecting credit card information.  So they know how to
implement walled gardens.  But what happens when public ISPs use it for 
infected machines?



More information about the NANOG mailing list