botnets: web servers, end-systems and Vint Cerf
Sean Donelan
sean at donelan.com
Sat Feb 17 04:49:58 UTC 2007
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Nicholas J. Shank wrote:
>> How is the "acceptable" infection rate for universities different than
> the
>> infection rate of other types of networks?
>
> Because other types of networks are expected (expected being the
> keyword) to have competent administrators.
Expected by whom?
How many home networks or even small business networks have competent
administrators?
What is the infection rate for the network at a typical NANOG meeting full
of Internet "experts?" What was the infection rate at the RSA security
conference network earlier this month?
Although some specific individual networks may have higher or lower
infection rates, I haven't see a significant difference in infection
rates between types of networks or industries. For universities with
low infection rates, there are just as many universities with high
infection rates. For government networks with low infection rates, there
are just as many government networks with high infection rates.
Would taking the practices from the specific individual networks with low
infection rates and using them elsewhere change the infection rate of
other networks?
More information about the NANOG
mailing list