European ISP enables IPv6 for all?
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 07:11:02 UTC 2007
On Dec 17, 2007 9:59 PM, Paul Ferguson <fergdawg at netzero.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> - -- "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
> [re: v6 mythos]
> >In a slightly more realistic vein, a huge address space makes life
> >harder for scanning worms. As Angelos Keromytis, Bill Cheswick, and I
> >have pointed out, "harder" is by no means equivalent to "impossible",
> >but the myth, new as it is, still propagates.
> And in fact, "threat propagation" in a v6 world may actually
> be worse than expected, and naiveté may actually contribute to
> a larger-scale attack, given the statistical possibility of
> potentially more victims.
naivete because folks believe the 'v6 is more secure' propoganda? or
some other reason?
> Address space size, and proximity, may well be red herrings in
> this discussion.
can you expand on this some?
More information about the NANOG