Cogent latency / congestion

Kevin Oberman oberman at es.net
Mon Aug 20 23:31:56 UTC 2007


> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:17:21 -0400
> From: Deepak Jain <deepak at ai.net>
> 
> > If someone sabotages a rail to stop a train and the derailment takes out
> > the fiber that is buried in the right-of-way, is that unintentional
> > sabotage? At least of the fiber?
> 
> That's not sabotage at all.
> 
> As it relates to the fiber, its not "deliberately and maliciously 
> destroying [fiber]"... unless the goal was to cause a derailment which 
> hurt the train operator both from the operation of the train and 
> subsequent revenues they might lose from fiber operations along the same
> right-of-way -- then *that* would be sabotage.
> 
> In the case you outlined above, barring other motivations, the fiber 
> would be "collateral damage".
> 
> That said, Cogent's page says nothing about sabotage 
> (status.cogentco.com) and I can't find the reference on teliasonera's 
> page.... Link please?

Too many people missed the emoticon. Clearly the fiber damage in the
case I gave was collateral damage. It would have been sabotage on the
rail line and the derailed train.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman at es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070820/8158872b/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list