Cogent latency / congestion
oberman at es.net
Mon Aug 20 22:47:39 UTC 2007
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:25:12 +0100
> From: "Rod Beck" <Rod.Beck at hiberniaatlantic.com>
> Sender: owner-nanog at merit.edu
> As opposed to 'unintentionally sabotaged'? I think there is some
> redundancy there ...
> Sorry for the cheap shot, it was just too tempting.
> Roderick S. Beck
> Director of EMEA Sales
> Hibernia Atlantic
> 1, Passage du Chantier, 75012 Paris
> Wireless: 1-212-444-8829.
> Landline: 33-1-4346-3209
> AOL Messenger: GlobalBandwidth
> rod.beck at hiberniaatlantic.com
> rodbeck at erols.com
> ``Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.''
> Albert Einstein.
If someone sabotages a rail to stop a train and the derailment takes out
the fiber that is buried in the right-of-way, is that unintentional
sabotage? At least of the fiber?
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman at es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 224 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the NANOG