Do I or RR need dns clue?
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
ml at t-b-o-h.net
Fri Aug 17 22:13:50 UTC 2007
>
>
> In article <200708170226.l7H2QZSw019129 at himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> you write:
> >
> >>
> >> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> >> > Down is there isn't power to it until it gets repaired. So its not
> >> > answering period. A "nslookup" shows "timed-out". A "dig" shows
> >> > "connection timed out; no servers could be reached" (When querying ONLY
> >> > against the down server).
> >> >
> >> > So how do I go back to RR, who told me to take it out of my
> >> > NS records, that DNS is supposed to be silently falling back and trying
> >> > again?
> >>
> >>
> >> The fact that they're rejecting on a 5xx error based on no DNS PTR is a
> >> bit harsh. While I'm all for requiring all hosts to have valid PTR
> >> records, there are times when transient or problem servers can cause a
> >> DNS lookup failure or miss, etc. If anything they should be returning a
> >> 4xx to have the remote host"try again later".
> >>
> >Robert,
> >
> > Sorry, they aren't giving a hard fail. Its a soft fail, so we'll
> >retry. But after 5 days of retrying, my servers will give up. (And, in
> >the mean time, the mail isn't getting through, so my users are without mail
> >{We store/forward for them} I don't know if the down (hard) server will be
> >back that soon (Its been 2 days as is). But the whole POINT of DNS is I have
> >a 2nd one listed, and they don't seem to care. They are telling me that they
> >want my "primary" one back up and running.
> >
> > Tuc/TBOH
>
> I know this is strange for nanog but if you actually stated the
> IP addresses of the mail servers we could look to see if there
> is a problem other than what you think the problem is.
>
> You havn't stated it here or on bind-users
>
> Mark
>
Hi,
Just a note to let everyone know its all working again. I was
escalated to someone else in RR and intelligent things came out of their
mouth and its not an issue anymore.
The initial responder at RR needs a clue, and the bind-users said
I was doing something "moderately bad" at the same time. I'm working out
a tactic to resolve my bent-clue issue. I hope to have that fixed in a
week or so. RR is now accepting my mail despite my "bent clue" and one
DNS server being down.
Tuc/TBOH
More information about the NANOG
mailing list