DNS not working

Fri Aug 17 18:03:54 UTC 2007

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:36:07 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
> 
> On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > 	I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm 
> > sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
> 
> This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS
> instead of a caching proxy?

Because there is no "Your kloo must be this tall to ride the Internet"
sign posted.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070817/b3774acd/attachment.sig>