Problems with either Cisco.com or AT&T?
mairhart at cisco.com
Wed Aug 8 20:06:07 UTC 2007
I can't speak for Cisco or Cisco IT, but as evidenced by this email,
at least part of our connectivity is up.
No doubt someone official is looking at it as we speak. (I'll just
lurk Nanog to get the skinny)..
>A brief look at routeviews shows www.cisco.com (184.108.40.206)
>originating from AS109 (Cisco) and transiting via AS7132 (AT&T/SBC) and
>AS7018 (AT&T). Thus I suspect this is an issue with AS109 (Cisco) and
>not with their providers. Though, I do feel wrong using the plural
>"providers" in this case...
More information about the NANOG