large organization nameservers sending icmp packets to dns servers.
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Mon Aug 6 15:57:08 UTC 2007
On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:53:15 EDT, Drew Weaver said:
> Is it a fairly normal practice for large companies such as Yahoo! And
> Mozilla to send icmp/ping packets to DNS servers? If so, why?
Sounds like one of the global-scale load balancers - when you do a (presumably)
recursive DNS lookup of one of their hosts, they'll ping the nameserver from
several locations and see which one gets an answer the fastest.
Yes, it's a semi-borkken strategy, because it assumes that:
1) ICMP is handled at the same rate as TCP/UDP packets in all the routers
involved (so there's no danger of declaring a path "slow" when it really isn't,
just becase a router slow-pathed ICMP).
2) That the actual requester of service is reasonably near net-wise to the
server handling the end-user's recursive DNS lookup.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070806/8f519876/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list