IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic)

J. Oquendo sil at infiltrated.net
Mon Apr 23 21:04:26 UTC 2007


Bill Woodcock wrote:
>       On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>     > ...what has that got to do with the DHS promoting an idea to sign IP
>     > space allocations and/or annoucements?  The idea in-and-of-itself doesn't
>     > sound wholly unreasonable.  (I am not advocating this, just saying the
>     > idea shouldn't be rejected without consideration simply because the DHS
>     > said it.)
>
> Exactly!  This whole thread has been people arguing against a straw-man.  
> DHS never asked for any KSKs or anything.  They're not even mentioned in 
> the report.  HSARPA just put up some of the money to fund the drafting of 
> the report, as ARPA/DARPA/HSARPA have been funding miscellaneous Internet 
> stuff forever.  
>
>                                 -Bill
>
>
>   

Which report did you read...

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/04/dept_of_homelan.html
http://www.upi.com/Security_Terrorism/Analysis/2007/04/12/analysis_owning_the_keys_to_the_internet/
http://www.tiawood.com/2007/homeland-security-grabs-for-nets-master-keys/



-- 
====================================================
J. Oquendo
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1383A743
echo infiltrated.net|sed 's/^/sil@/g' 

"Wise men talk because they have something to say;
fools, because they have to say something." -- Plato


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5157 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070423/76a3abcf/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list