IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic)
J. Oquendo
sil at infiltrated.net
Mon Apr 23 21:04:26 UTC 2007
Bill Woodcock wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> > ...what has that got to do with the DHS promoting an idea to sign IP
> > space allocations and/or annoucements? The idea in-and-of-itself doesn't
> > sound wholly unreasonable. (I am not advocating this, just saying the
> > idea shouldn't be rejected without consideration simply because the DHS
> > said it.)
>
> Exactly! This whole thread has been people arguing against a straw-man.
> DHS never asked for any KSKs or anything. They're not even mentioned in
> the report. HSARPA just put up some of the money to fund the drafting of
> the report, as ARPA/DARPA/HSARPA have been funding miscellaneous Internet
> stuff forever.
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
Which report did you read...
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/04/dept_of_homelan.html
http://www.upi.com/Security_Terrorism/Analysis/2007/04/12/analysis_owning_the_keys_to_the_internet/
http://www.tiawood.com/2007/homeland-security-grabs-for-nets-master-keys/
--
====================================================
J. Oquendo
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1383A743
echo infiltrated.net|sed 's/^/sil@/g'
"Wise men talk because they have something to say;
fools, because they have to say something." -- Plato
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5157 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070423/76a3abcf/attachment.bin>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list