Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet
Joe Loiacono
jloiacon at csc.com
Thu Apr 12 20:31:48 UTC 2007
owner-nanog at merit.edu wrote on 04/12/2007 04:05:43 PM:
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Joe Loiacono wrote:
>
> > Large MTUs enable significant throughput performance enhancements for
> > large data transfers over long round-trip times (RTTs.) The original
>
> This is solved by increasing TCP window size, it doesn't depend very
much
> on MTU.
Window size is of course critical, but it turns out that MTU also impacts
rates (as much as 33%, see below):
MSS 0.7
Rate = ----- * -------
RTT (P)**0.5
MSS = Maximum Segment Size
RTT = Round Trip Time
P = packet loss
Mathis, et. al. have 'verified the model through both simulation and live
Internet measurements.'
Also (http://www.aarnet.edu.au/engineering/networkdesign/mtu/why.html):
"This is shown to be the case in Anand and Hartner's "TCP/IP Network Stack
Performance in Linux Kernel 2.4 and 2.5" in Proceedings of the Ottawa
Linux Symposium, 2002. Their experience was that a machine using a 1500
byte MTU could only reach 750Mbps whereas the same machine configured with
9000 byte MTUs handsomely reached 1Gbps."
AARnet - Australia's Academic and Research Network
>
> Larger MTU is better for devices that for instance do per-packet
> interrupting, like most endsystems probably do. It doesn't increase
> long-RTT transfer performance per se (unless you have high packetloss
> because you'll slow-start more efficiently).
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070412/5b9681e2/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list