Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet
Keegan.Holley at sungard.com
Keegan.Holley at sungard.com
Thu Apr 12 15:34:43 UTC 2007
I think it's a great idea operationally, less work for the routers and
more efficient use of bandwidth. It would also be useful to devise some
way to at least partially reassemble fragmented frames at links capable of
large MTU's. Since most PC's are on a subnet with a MTU of 1500 (or 1519)
packets would still be limited to 1500B or fragmented before they reach
the higher speed links. The problem with bringing this to fruition in the
internet is going to be cost and effort. The ATT's and Verizons of the
world are going to see this as a major upgrade without much benefit or
profit. The Cisco's and Junipers are going to say the same thing when
they have to write this into their code plus interoperability with other
vendors implementations of it.
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch at muada.com>
Sent by: owner-nanog at merit.edu
04/12/2007 05:20 AM
To
NANOG list <nanog at merit.edu>
cc
Subject
Thoughts on increasing MTUs on the internet
Dear NANOGers,
It irks me that today, the effective MTU of the internet is 1500
bytes, while more and more equipment can handle bigger packets.
What do you guys think about a mechanism that allows hosts and
routers on a subnet to automatically discover the MTU they can use
towards other systems on the same subnet, so that:
1. It's no longer necessary to limit the subnet MTU to that of the
least capable system
2. It's no longer necessary to manage 1500 byte+ MTUs manually
Any additional issues that such a mechanism would have to address?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070412/99213abb/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list