Blocking mail from bad places
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Sat Apr 7 22:27:16 UTC 2007
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 11:40:50 PDT, Thomas Leavitt said:
> ... and why aren't bounce messages standardized in content and formatting?!?
Jiminy creepers, why can't people run software that implements standards
from the last frikking *millenium*??!?
1891 SMTP Service Extension for Delivery Status Notifications. K.
Moore. January 1996. (Format: TXT=65192 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC3461)
(Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
1892 The Multipart/Report Content Type for the Reporting of Mail
System Administrative Messages. G. Vaudreuil. January 1996. (Format:
TXT=7800 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC3462) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
1893 Enhanced Mail System Status Codes. G. Vaudreuil. January 1996.
(Format: TXT=28218 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC3463) (Status: PROPOSED
STANDARD)
1894 An Extensible Message Format for Delivery Status Notifications.
K. Moore, G. Vaudreuil. January 1996. (Format: TXT=77462 bytes)
(Obsoleted by RFC3464) (Updated by RFC2852) (Status: PROPOSED
STANDARD)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070407/274b0d5b/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list