redefining which infrastructure is the proble [was: Re: On-going ..]

Rod Beck Rod.Beck at hiberniaatlantic.com
Mon Apr 2 14:16:34 UTC 2007


Hi John, 

No where in that email did I say Spamhaus was an American organization. 

So let's not be petty. 

As for Spamahaus' professionalism, I would be point that some organizations that use opt-in list still get hit by Spamhaus either because the end users complained after apparently 
1. forgetting that they had opted into the list
2. or they changed their mind. 

Many of the biggest publishing houses now run their email operations overseas precisely because they are tired of dealing with Spamhaus complaints

The question is how is to achieve accountability. 

I don't think volunteer organizations are ideal from an accountability point of view. 

Regards, 

Roderick S. Beck
Hibernia Atlantic
30 Dongan Place, NY, NY 10040
http://www.hiberniaatlantic.com
Landline: 1-212-942-3345
Wireless: 1-212-444-8829. 
rod.beck at hiberniaatlantic.com
rodbeck at erols.com
``Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.'' Albert Einstein. 



-----Original Message-----
From: John Levine [mailto:johnl at iecc.com]
Sent: Mon 4/2/2007 3:03 PM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Cc: Rod Beck
Subject: Re: redefining which infrastructure is the proble [was: Re: On-going  ..]
 

>I rarely post, but that is clearly a problem. The Americans seem to
>believe in the presumption of guilt and the infallibility of
>accusation. As an American born and bred I can hardly be accused of
>bias.

>Clearly spam is a serious problem in terms of draining network
>resources, but organizations like Spamhaus don't even do an
>investigation.

Even if this were on-topic, don't you think it would a good idea to
make at least a cursory attempt to get your facts straight?  Spamhaus
is located in the UK, I personally know multiple Spamhaus volunteers
who spend vast amounts of time resarching their blacklist entries,
and they put large dossiers on their web site to document them.

ObOperations: Spamhaus publishes a drop list of IP ranges intended for
your router that I heartily recommend.  It is much smaller than their
mail blacklist, chosen to include only network ranges with no
socically redeeming value at all.

R's,
John


Hi Joe, 

I know some organizations that use opt-in list and yet got complaints either because the end users complained after apparently 
1. forgetting that they opted into the list
2. or they changed their mind. 

Many of the biggest publishing houses now run their email operations overseas precisely because they are tired dealing with Spamhaus. 

This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately telephone or e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts or agreements referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia Atlantic has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20070402/61c22706/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list