Outages mailing list

Rick Kunkel kunkel at w-link.net
Fri Sep 29 23:23:18 UTC 2006



On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, chip wrote:

> On 9/29/06, Rick Kunkel <kunkel at w-link.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> >
> > > Rick Kunkel wrote:
> > > > I thought about cutting and pasting verbatim the notification I got from
> > > > InterNAP, but then noticed the "The contents of this email message are
> > > > confidential and proprietary" blurb at the end, and thought better of it,
> > > > even though they weren't to blame...
> > >
> > > Somebody actually reads those???
> > >
> > >
> 
> > I generally don't pay too much attention...  In this case, I hadn't even
> > seen one.  But, for whatever reason, after the email was composed, I
> > suddenly thought maybe I should check.  The last thing I wanted to be
> > responsible was somehow violating a contract or something.  Who knows,
> > maybe it's in the blasted 9 billion page agreement that management types
> > sign when we get service from people.
> >
> > In any case, InterNAP's was a far cry from the kind that you parody
> > below.  It really only was that one sentence....
> >
> > "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary."
> >
> > Nevertheless, maybe I should post it anyhow.  It's not like it shows them
> > in a bad light.  On the contrary, they've been the most in-touch and
> > seemingly truthful amongst the providers we've had.
> >
> > --Rick
> >
> >
> 
> It wouldn't be the first time INAP's e-mails have been posted.  But
> really it doesn't say anymore than what's already been said on this
> list thus far.  Fiber cut, some routing horkage on the West Coast with
> gblx and maybe some other providers, people working on it, no ETR,
> yadda, yadda, yadda.
> 
> --chip
> 
> -- 
> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....
> 

Actually, an InterNAP Support Engineer on this list just said it was fine 
to quote the notification since it was a widescale issue.  But, as Chip 
says, it's kind of old news at this point.  If people want to see it 
though, I can post.  (Actually, there were two.)

Thanks,

Rick
sigless







More information about the NANOG mailing list