that 4byte ASN you were considering...

Joe Abley jabley at
Tue Oct 10 19:53:53 UTC 2006

On 10-Oct-2006, at 12:01, David W. Hankins wrote:

> But it's just /weird/ to ask the IETF to have this kind of
> it has never had to my memory, and seeks constantly
> not to fulfill.

It's not so weird when you realise that the notation adopted has an  
impact on other IETF work (RPSL is the obvious example that springs  
to mind).


More information about the NANOG mailing list