Anyone else seeing latency through SJC2.ALTER.NET?
Payam Tarverdyan Chychi
payam at bhsecurity.com
Tue Oct 10 01:54:29 UTC 2006
Hey Wil,
By having the circuit shut down do you mean its shut down from your end?
If so, why not just bring up the link and deactivate the ospf neighbors,
that way you can still have a vantage point to monitor the problem while
not having any impact on your networks traffic.
Cheers,
--Payam
William Schultz wrote:
>
> I've spoke to MCI, which is our hand off... They say things are okay
> now (as of about 15 minutes ago). Problem was caused by "high
> utilization", unknown what device.
>
> Are you still seeing latency? I've got that circuit shut down so I'm
> blind.
>
> -Wil
>
> On Oct 9, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Jonathan Claybaugh wrote:
>
>> Wil,
>>
>> My traffic enters Alternet in LAX (but not SJC). I've been seeing a
>> great deal of latency and packet loss through LAX1<->SEA1 for the
>> last few hours.
>>
>> The problem seemed to spike about 20 minutes ago.
>>
>> Cheers
>> -Jonathan
>>
>> via Alternet.William Schultz wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 5 0.so-1-0-0.GW1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (157.130.203.17) 2.173 ms
>>> 2.419 ms 2.228 ms
>>> 6 127.ATM4-0.XR1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.202) 287.247 ms
>>> 287.482 ms 287.548 ms
>>> 7 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.137) 287.316 ms
>>> 287.743 ms 288.016 ms
>>>
>>> 5 0.so-5-1-0.GW6.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.54.169) 1.998 ms 1.918
>>> ms 0.so-1-0-0.GW1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (157.130.203.17) 1.606 ms
>>> 6 0.so-0-3-0.XL1.SJC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.174) 289.389 ms
>>> 293.047 ms 127.ATM4-0.XR2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.206) 294.331 ms
>>> 7 0.so-1-0-0.XL2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.141) 294.862 ms
>>> 0.so-7-0-0.XL1.SCL2.ALTER.NET (152.63.54.134) 3.410 ms
>>> 0.so-1-0-0.XL2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.141) 295.108 ms
>>>
>>> 4 63.66.208.1 (63.66.208.1) 2.200 ms 2.143 ms 1.299 ms
>>> 5 0.so-1-1-0.GW1.SJC2.ALTER.NET (157.130.203.13) 274.324 ms
>>> 273.923 ms 273.909 ms
>>> 6 127.ATM5-0.XR2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.198) 1.973 ms 2.476
>>> ms 2.431 ms
>>> 7 0.so-1-0-0.XL2.SJC2.ALTER.NET (152.63.56.141) 274.125 ms
>>> 274.027 ms 274.190 ms
>>>
>>> -Wil
>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list