that 4byte ASN you were considering...

bmanning at bmanning at
Mon Oct 9 20:48:34 UTC 2006

FYI...  ifyou think you have an opinion about this, it might be worth a read
before the IESG dictates how you can use/code these badboys...


The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:

- 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers '
   <draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation-01.txt> as an Informational RFC

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
iesg at or ietf at mailing lists by 2006-11-06.

The file can be obtained via    


More information about the NANOG mailing list