BCP38 thread 93,871,738,435 + SPF
dotis at mail-abuse.org
Sun Oct 29 15:35:46 UTC 2006
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 00:52 -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
> If you believe SPF prevents you from doing it, can you elaborate how?
Spam referencing malicious SPF scripts can result in PASS or NEUTRAL,
where the message and message rates may be normal. Recipients will not
notice the role they are playing in an ongoing attack. There would be
few clues, and BCP38 or ACLs will not prevent an SPF attack.
>From a victim's perspective, there could be tens or hundreds of
thousands of attack sources. No source represents an address of a
Botnet. An attack could be composed of A-record transactions for hosts
not seen in any message, or related to the domains of any SPF script.
These SPF scripts might also later morph to frustrate forensic analysis
or real-time blocking.
SPF scripts add indirection from what is within a message. An attacking
transaction would pass through DNS from one of the hundred thousand
recipients. Finding a recipient will not link a DNS transaction to a
message. The source of the message may also be a reputable provider.
The recipient would need to trace the targets of all associated SPF
scripts. A particular SPF script might be one of a hundred other
scripts targeting the same victim, however. Analysis designed not to
add to an attack can also be seen by the attacker.
Nothing in the experimental SPF or Sender-ID RFCs explain how such
catastrophic attacks are avoided. Their recommended premature
termination of SPF scripts ensures there is no congestion avoidance as
How would you identify and quell an SPF attack in progress?
More information about the NANOG