register.com down sev0?
Chris L. Morrow
christopher.morrow at verizonbusiness.com
Sat Oct 28 17:36:50 UTC 2006
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:10:05PM -0400, alex at pilosoft.com wrote:
> > As pointed out by Rob Seastrom in private email, RFC2182 addresses things
> > of biblical proportions - such as dispersion of nameservers geographically
> > and topologically. Having 3 secondaries, only one of them on separate /24,
> > and none of them on topologically different network does not qualify.
> ns1.register.com. 600 IN A 184.108.40.206
> ns2.register.com. 600 IN A 220.127.116.11
> ns3.register.com. 600 IN A 18.104.22.168
> ns4.register.com. 600 IN A 22.214.171.124
> I am not saying that register.com IS doing this, just that you can't say
> that they're NOT just from this evidence.
I think Alex could have included a few lines of traceroute to these hosts
showing that they all end behind:
7 tbr1-p014001.wswdc.ip.att.net (126.96.36.199) 9.754 ms 9.685 ms 9.608
8 tbr1-cl4.sl9mo.ip.att.net (188.8.131.52) 29.708 ms 29.593 ms 33.498
9 184.108.40.206 (220.127.116.11) 36.300 ms 28.558 ms 28.521 ms
So... it sorta looks like both /24's are behind something in StLouis,
Missouri ( to me atleast ).
More information about the NANOG