The Cidr Report

Scott Morris swm at emanon.com
Sun Nov 12 19:17:29 UTC 2006


It sounds like government work!  When something doesn't work, they just make
numbers up!  (Just be sure to create more plausible numbers next time!
(smirk))

Scott
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog at merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog at merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Geoff Huston
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 12:15 PM
To: Fergie; simon at limmat.switch.ch
Cc: nanog at merit.edu
Subject: Re: The Cidr Report


When my zebra BGP daemin looses its grip on life and dies a horrible death
the rest to the scripts wander into a strange twilight zone and make up
numbers

sorry

(I really need to code more defensively for this type of condition!)

   geoff

At 04:56 AM 11/11/2006, Fergie wrote:

>Indeed -- it apears to have flaked out a bit this (IETF) week. :-)
>
>Date              Prefixes        CIDR Aggregated
>04-11-06          199323          129829
>05-11-06          199330          129854
>06-11-06          199273          129854
>07-11-06          -1077937252     129854
>08-11-06          -1077936760     129854
>09-11-06          672037797       129854
>10-11-06          -1077937324     129854
>11-11-06          134555024       129854
>
>- ferg
>
>
>
>-- Simon Leinen <simon at limmat.switch.ch> wrote:
>
>cidr-report  writes:
> > Recent Table History
> >         Date      Prefixes    CIDR Agg
> >         03-11-06    199409      129843
>[...]
> >         10-11-06  134555024      129854
>
>Growth of the "global routing table" really picked up pace this week!
>(But maybe I'm just hallucinating for having heard the report from the 
>IAB Routing Workshop report three times in a week :-) Or the CIDR 
>Report software has an R200K problem?
>--
>Simon.
>
>
>
>--
>"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
>  Engineering Architecture for the Internet
>  fergdawg(at)netzero.net
>  ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/






More information about the NANOG mailing list