karlinjf at cs.unm.edu
Fri Nov 10 05:59:20 UTC 2006
Wouldn't they want to hijack more specifics to spam? I doubt much of
that space is going to correctly route for spamming purposes.
On 11/9/06, Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Josh Karlin wrote:
> > Here is one that is somewhat the opposite, the AS announced a
> > significant portion of IANA allocated space. Note, they are large
> > blocks and as such probably did not cause much damage because most
> > networks announce more specifics. My question to the community is,
> > what kind of misconfiguration could cause this set of prefixes to be
> > announced? I asked the AS responsible, but have not had a response.
> Misconfiguration? :-) That's a nice word for spammer. See Joe's PPT at:
> AS29449 is not the problem. It is the upstreams of AS5602 (KPNQwest
> Italia) and AS286 (KPN) that let this crap leak.
> -Hank Nussbacher
More information about the NANOG