Verizon PSTN continued

virendra rode // virendra.rode at gmail.com
Wed Nov 8 06:45:41 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Wallace Keith wrote:
> 
>> Working with 2 other carriers on a similar issue, response I rec'd was
>> congestion due to automated political dialers. Not sure if I believe
>> that or not...
> 
> you'd think they'd have systems monitoring that and trimming down the
> 'fat'? or can they do that? (legally I mean, sorta like QOS for the phone
> network I suppose)
- ------------------------
I guess it depends on the type of VoIP deployment.

http://www.softarmor.com/wgdb/docs/draft-camarillo-sipping-sbc-funcs-02.txt


regards,
/virendra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFUX0VpbZvCIJx1bcRAqUQAKCwfwsszTIAkMeEtwp0J4g5CxrVIACfYqjD
WNcHEZDbB1o344Ck6h91bbk=
=b/hK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the NANOG mailing list