MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain

Valdis.Kletnieks at Valdis.Kletnieks at
Thu May 11 18:00:58 UTC 2006

On Thu, 11 May 2006 13:40:22 EDT, Alain Hebert said:
>     If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere 
> else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there.

The problem is that it's a TLD, not  What standard of "porn"
do you intend to enforce?  Remember there's places that have Internet
where females are still supposed to keep their faces covered in public.

Besides which, "if we can corral them in it" looks like a very implausible

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the NANOG mailing list