AOL 421 errors
Matt Ghali
matt at snark.net
Thu May 4 17:47:28 UTC 2006
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Joe Maimon wrote:
> <COUNTER-RANT>
> You know, people say things like this a lot. Its not relevant. What is
> relevant is how AOL is supposed to know that
>
> a) the email considered for rejection is actually wanted
> b) and wanted by AOL employees themselves
>
> And if they did know how to accurately determine that, we wouldnt be having
> this discussion.
The irony here of course, is that Matt Black's systems can't even
tell if they want the mail until _after_ the accept it- but that's a
feature, and AOL's in-transaction softfails are evil. Or something.
matto
--matt at snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin><
Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.
- Marshall McLuhan
More information about the NANOG
mailing list