"Bad bgp identifier"
jmaimon at ttec.com
Fri Mar 31 10:06:54 UTC 2006
4271 specifies that bgp identifier must be a valid unicast ip address
So what is the larget 32 bit value expressed as a dotted quad that meets
Is it the last address in class c? class e? Can 255.x.x.x be used?
Do all vendors implement this?
I understand that draft-ietf-idr-bgp-identifier-06.txt does away with
the above requirements. Is this something I should ask vendors if they
will support it?
More information about the NANOG