Wiltel has gone pink.

Tue Mar 14 21:16:49 UTC 2006

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:22:33 PST, Jo Rhett said:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:05:25PM -0500, andrew2 at one.net wrote:
> > Or perhaps there's a more reasonable explanation like being assimilated
> > with Level3 and perhaps some contact info. is a little stale at this
> > point in the merger process...  Never attribute to malfeasance what can
> > be explained by everyday corporate beauracracy.
>
> I'm missing the point where I am supposed to care.  The regulations
> concerning proper contact information don't mention this exception.
>
> Complete and utter incompetence (ie spam filtering their abuse mailbox) are
> to blame for mail being rejected, and the phone numbers being out of date
> are their fault, not a valid excuse.

If anything, it's *easier* to deal with clued providers that have misplaced their
moral compass and gone pink, than to deal with mere stupidity.  Alas, both types
of sites are present in sufficient numbers to overwhelm almost anybody's
ability to continue caring....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20060314/5ab33aa2/attachment.sig>