shim6 @ NANOG

Roland Dobbins rdobbins at
Mon Mar 6 02:52:42 UTC 2006

On Mar 5, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Joe Abley wrote:

> Very little time has been spent on shim6 so far. Far more time  
> before that was spent on multi6, which considered many different  
> approaches to multi-homing.

Spending time in and of itself has no value, you're entirely  
correct.  Spending time to come up with a solution which does not  
engage in problem-shifting routing onto the nodes, fixed geographic  
allocations (another nonstarter for reasons which have been  
elucidated previously), and other schemes which ignore customer  
requirements and correspond to operational and business realities - 
does- have value, and that's what's being proposed.

Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at> // 408.527.6376 voice

      Everything has been said.  But nobody listens.

                    -- Roger Shattuck

More information about the NANOG mailing list