shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)

Sun Mar 5 09:12:20 UTC 2006

On 4 mar 2006, at 17.43, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:

> On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:59:18 +0100
> Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis at kurtis.pp.se> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>
>>> I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was
>>> any faster.  So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be,
>>> in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90%
>>> deployment.
>>
>> OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all
>> Windows XP boxes....
>>
> Teredo is described in RFC 4380; it's a Proposed Standard.

Duh. Given I was part of the discussion of which prefixes to use in  
the document I should have remembered that...

Still it was deployed way before that.

- kurtis -