shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
Steven M. Bellovin
smb at cs.columbia.edu
Sat Mar 4 16:43:02 UTC 2006
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:59:18 +0100
Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis at kurtis.pp.se> wrote:
> On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> > I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was
> > any faster. So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be,
> > in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90%
> > deployment.
> OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all
> Windows XP boxes....
Teredo is described in RFC 4380; it's a Proposed Standard.
I should note that Microsoft really believes in IPv6. I wonder what
that means for its future....
More information about the NANOG