2005-1, good or bad? [Was: Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing]

Kurt Erik Lindqvist kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Sat Mar 4 12:37:59 UTC 2006

On 3 mar 2006, at 04.54, Marshall Eubanks wrote:

>> Finallly, allow me to observe that deciding on this issues  
>> regionally while the resulting routes must be carried world wide  
>> doesn't make sense. We really need a global forum for this.
> I fully agree here. Maybe a meeting should be organized in the fall  
> of 2006 or early 2007 to discuss this,
> either under the auspices of the NRO (http://www.nro.net) or  
> independently.

Problem is that there simply is not one-size fits all when it comes  
to allocation policies. Besides that, AFAIK the NRO have no policy  
role at all - by design. Policy is set my open meetings at each of  
the RIRs.

- kurtis -

More information about the NANOG mailing list