shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
thegameiam at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 3 05:12:58 UTC 2006
--- Tony Li <tony.li at tony.li> wrote:
> Consider that the IETF
> *could* conceivably
> require every compliant v6 implementation to include
God Forbid. I somehow don't want my core routers
deciding to speak shim6...
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the NANOG