shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)

David Barak thegameiam at
Fri Mar 3 05:12:58 UTC 2006

--- Tony Li < at> wrote:

>  Consider that the IETF
> *could* conceivably
> require every compliant v6 implementation to include
> it.  

God Forbid.  I somehow don't want my core routers
deciding to speak shim6...

David Barak
Need Geek Rock?  Try The Franchise:

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

More information about the NANOG mailing list