shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
dgolding at burtongroup.com
Wed Mar 1 04:37:34 UTC 2006
On 2/28/06 5:21 PM, "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch at muada.com> wrote:
> On 28-feb-2006, at 23:15, John Payne wrote:
>>> Should be doable with a DNS SRV record like mechanism. Don't worry
>>> too much about this one.
>> Where does the assumption that the network operators control the
>> DNS for the end hosts come from?
> ...or in another way. Don't worry too much about this one.
Unacceptable. This is the whole problem with shim6 - the IETF telling us to
"sit back and enjoy it, because your vendors know what's best". This
attitude combined with Shim6's (many) limitations speed it toward
More information about the NANOG