insane over-regulation - what not to do
Bill Woodcock
woody at pch.net
Wed Jun 21 17:40:07 UTC 2006
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Randy Whitney wrote:
> Could you be more specific? Are you talking about "Part VIII
> DOMAIN NAME REGISTAR" or something else?
Not presuming to answer for Randy, just for myself:
This follows one of the typical failure-modes of technical legislation,
which is that it contains quite a few good ideas (cryptographic signatures
should be deemed to fulfill the role of signatures, nonrepudiatable
electronic delivery should be deemed to constitute delivery, etc.) which
are re-worded in less-specific "more accessible" language by lawyers,
chopped into very small bits, mixed and blended until uniformly
unrecognizable, and allowed to ferment until twelve times larger.
These things typically create a bit of a baby-with-the-bathwater conundrum
for people who think they know what _should_ be done, since many of the
things that _should_ be done are in fact buried in the legalese, and
starting over from scratch with the same seeds would, like as not, yield
a very similar bloated bloated end-product, with another year or two
wasted in the mean-time. Which all comes down to the old maxim: you can't
legislate stupidity out of existence. Or, perhaps, legislation, by its
very existence, brings some stupidity into existence.
Less is more.
-Bill
More information about the NANOG
mailing list