Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal
JJackson at aninetworks.com
Tue Jul 11 22:51:20 UTC 2006
> Behalf Of Florian Weimer
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:58 AM
> To: Mark Newton
> Cc: Seth Johnson; nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal
> * Mark Newton:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:39:50AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Mark Newton:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 07:58:48AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > > (I've wondered for quite some time if "net
> neutrality" implies
> > that > > > Ebay or Google must carry third party traffic on their
> > corporate > > > networks, by the way.) > > eBay and
> Google aren't
> > selling transit.
> > >
> > > Neither is your local cable company. 8-)
> > Eh? Of course they are. They're selling transit to their
> cable modem
> > customers, surely?
> Quote from a typical terms of service agreement:
> | (b) Subscriber will not resell the Service, or any portion
> thereof, or
> | otherwise charge others to use the Service, or any portion thereof.
> | The Service is for personal use only, and Subscriber agrees
> not to use
> | the Service for operation as an Internet Service Provider,
> to host web
> | sites for other parties or for any other business enterprise or to
> | connect the Cable modem to any server or to any computer outside of
> | the Subscriber's premises.
> | (c) Without Time Warner Cable 's prior written approval, Subscriber
> | shall not post or transmit through the Service any material that
> | constitutes or contains advertising or any solicitation
> with respect
> | to products or services, nor shall Subscriber transmit bulk e-mail
> | without prior written permission from Time Warner Cable.
> IP transit has no such restrictions.
We currently buy ip transit service from Cox Cable. You can also get a
buisness cable modem service from them and resell transit on it. Tho
this might only apply to the Las Vegas market.
More information about the NANOG